doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.774885
Original Articles |
Long-Term Clinical Results of 2 Different Ablation Strategies in Patients With Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
From the Division of Cardiology (G.F., C.D., S.M., M.A., C.A., D.M.F., D.D.P., G.C.), Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy; and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Statistics and Mathematics (C.D.), University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Correspondence to Fiorenzo Gaita, MD, Division of Cardiology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turin, Corso Dante, 202, 14100 Asti, Italy. E-mail gaita{at}asl.at.it
Received February 25, 2008; accepted August 11, 2008.
Background— Data regarding the long-term efficacy of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are still lacking.
Methods and Results— Two hundred four consecutive patients symptomatic for paroxysmal or persistent/permanent AF were randomly assigned to 2 different ablation schemes: pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and PVI plus left linear lesions (LL). Primary end point was to assess the maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) after procedures 1 and 2 in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in a long-term follow-up of at least 3 years.
Paroxysmal AF— With a single procedure at 12-month follow-up, 46% of patients treated with PVI maintained SR, whereas at 3-year follow-up, 29% were in SR; using the "PVI plus LL" at the 12-month follow-up, 57% of patients were in SR, whereas at the 3-year follow-up, 53% remained in SR. After a second procedure, the long-term overall success rate without antiarrhythmic drugs was 62% with PVI and 85% with PVI plus LL.
Persistent/Permanent AF— With a single procedure at the 12-month follow-up, 27% of patients treated with PVI were in SR, whereas at the 3-year follow-up, 19% maintained SR; using the PVI plus LL with a single procedure at the 12-month follow-up 45% of patients were in SR, whereas at the 3-year follow-up, 41% remained in SR. After a second procedure, the long-term overall success rate without antiarrhythmic drugs was 39% with PVI and 75% with PVI plus LL.
Conclusions— A long-term follow-up of AF ablation shows that short-term results cannot be considered permanent because AF recurrences are still present after the first year especially in patients who have had "PVI" strategy. PVI isolation plus LL is superior to the PVI strategy in maintaining SR without antiarrhythmic drugs after procedures 1 and 2 both in paroxysmal and persistent AF.
Key Words: ablation • arrhythmia • atrial fibrillation • catheter ablation • follow-up
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
Related Articles
- Further Insight into the Technique and Outcomes of "Curative" Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
- Hugh Calkins
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008 1: 238-239.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Long-Term Clinical Results of 2 Different Ablation Strategies in Patients With Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Fiorenzo Gaita, Domenico Caponi, Marco Scaglione, Antonio Montefusco, Antonella Corleto, Fernando Di Monte, Daniele Coin, Paolo Di Donna, and Carla Giustetto
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008 1: 269-275.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. B. Forleo and C. Tondo Atrial fibrillation: cure or treat? Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2009; 3(3): 187 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Calkins Further Insight into the Technique and Outcomes of "Curative" Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, October 1, 2008; 1(4): 238 - 239. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|