Published online before print October 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.799619
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Articles |
Comparison of Electroanatomic Contact and Noncontact Mapping of Ventricular Scar in a Postinfarct Ovine Model With Intramural Needle Electrode Recording and Histological Validation
From the Cardiology Department, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Correspondence to Pramesh Kovoor, Cardiology Department, Westmead Hospital, Corner Darcy and Hawkesbury Roads, Westmead, NSW, Australia 2145. E-mail kovoor{at}westgate.wh.usyd.edu.au
Received June 15, 2008; accepted September 24, 2008.
Background— Substrate-based ablation is useful for nonhemodynamically tolerated postinfarct ventricular tachycardia. We assessed the accuracy of the CARTO contact and EnSite noncontact systems at identifying scar in a chronic ovine model with intramural plunge needle electrode recording and histological validation.
Methods and Results— Scar mapping was performed on 8 male sheep with previous percutaneous-induced myocardial infarction. Up to 20 plunge needles were inserted into the left ventricle of each animal in areas of dense scar, scar border, and normal myocardium. A simultaneous CARTO map and EnSite geometry were acquired using a single catheter, and needle electrode locations were registered. A dynamic substrate map was constructed using ratiometric 50% peak negative voltage. The scar percentage around each needle location was quantified histologically. Analysis was performed on 152 plunge needles and corresponding histological blocks. Spearman correlation with histology was 0.690 (P<0.001) for needle electrode peak-to-peak voltage (PPV), 0.362 (P<0.001) and 0.492 (P<0.001) for CARTO bipolar and unipolar PPV, and 0.381 (P<0.001) for EnSite dynamic substrate map (
40 mm from array). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (<50% and 
50% scar) was 0.896 for needle electrode PPV, 0.726 and 0.697 for CARTO bipolar and unipolar PPV, and 0.703 for EnSite dynamic substrate map (40 mm from array).
Conclusions— Both the CARTO contact and EnSite noncontact systems were moderately accurate in identifying postinfarct scar when compared with intramural electrodes and confirmed with histology. The EnSite dynamic substrate map was comparable to the CARTO contact bipolar PPV when points >40 mm from the array were excluded.
Key Words: arrhythmia • electrophysiology • mapping • myocardial infarction
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
Related Article
- Comparison of Electroanatomic Contact and Noncontact Mapping of Ventricular Scar in a Postinfarct Ovine Model With Intramural Needle Electrode Recording and Histological Validation
- Gopal Sivagangabalan, Jim Pouliopoulos, Kaimin Huang, Juntang Lu, Michael A. Barry, Aravinda Thiagalingam, David L. Ross, Stuart P. Thomas, and Pramesh Kovoor
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008 1: 363-369.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. Sivagangabalan, J. Pouliopoulos, K. Huang, M. A. Barry, J. Lu, S. P. Thomas, D. L. Ross, A. Thiagalingam, and P. Kovoor Simultaneous Biventricular Noncontact Mapping and Ablation of Septal Ventricular Tachycardia in a Chronic Ovine Infarct Model Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, August 1, 2009; 2(4): 441 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Aliot, W. G. Stevenson, J. M. Almendral-Garrote, F. Bogun, C. H. Calkins, E. Delacretaz, P. D. Bella, G. Hindricks, P. Jais, M. E. Josephson, et al. EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 771 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|