Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009;2:120-128
Published online before print February 13, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.818211
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/120    most recent
CIRCEP.108.818211v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrowRelated Article

Original Articles

Remote Robotic Navigation and Electroanatomical Mapping for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Considerations for Navigation and Impact on Procedural Outcome

Boris Schmidt, MD; Roland R. Tilz, MD; Kars Neven, MD; K.R. Julian Chun, MD; Alexander Fürnkranz, MD and Feifan Ouyang, MD

From the Hanseatisches Herzzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.

Correspondence to Boris Schmidt, MD, Hanseatisches Herzzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmuehlenstr. 5, 20099 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail bor.schmidt{at}asklepios.com

Received August 31, 2008; accepted December 17, 2008.

Background— Radiofrequency current ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires high technical skills to achieve optimal catheter stability and is associated with an individually high x-ray exposure to both the patient and the operator. To facilitate catheter navigation and to reduce the operator’s x-ray burden, remote navigation (RN) systems have been developed. Considerations for navigation of a novel remote robotic navigation system in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures are reported.

Methods and Results— In 65 patients with drug-refractory AF (43 paroxysmal, 22 persistent), complete circumferential PVI was performed using RN in conjunction with different electroanatomic mapping systems. Acute complete PVI using exclusively RN was achieved in 95%. The procedure time was 195±40 minutes. The operator’s x-ray exposure time was reduced by 6±4 minutes (35%) using RN. In 7 of 14 patients with persistent AF, conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved by radiofrequency current ablation. During a median follow-up period of 239 days (range, 184 to 314 days), 47 of 65 patients (73%) remained free of any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after a single procedure. The relative proportion of patients remaining free of AF was 76% and 68% for paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively.

Conclusions— PVI using the novel RN system can be performed safely and effectively. One third of the operator’s fluoroscopy exposure time might be saved using RN. However, the questions of whether the overall fluoroscopy exposure is reduced by RN and whether RN improves PVI procedures needs to be assessed during a comparative trial between man and machine.

Key Words: ablation • fibrillation • mapping • pulmonary vein isolation • remote robotic navigation


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Drs Schmidt and Tilz contributed equally to this study.


Related Article

Remote Robotic Navigation and Electroanatomical Mapping for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Considerations for Navigation and Impact on Procedural Outcome
Boris Schmidt, Roland R. Tilz, Kars Neven, K.R. Julian Chun, Alexander Fürnkranz, and Feifan Ouyang
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009 2: 120-128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]