Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009;2:162-170
Published online before print February 18, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.785352
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/162    most recent
CIRCEP.108.785352v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrowRelated Articles

Original Articles

Interaction of Activation–Repolarization Coupling and Restitution Properties in Humans

Ben Hanson, PhD; Peter Sutton, PhD; Nasser Elameri; Marcus Gray, PhD; Hugo Critchley, MB, PhD; Jaswinder S. Gill, MD, FRCP and Peter Taggart, MD, DSc, FRCP

From the Department of Mechanical Engineering (B.H.), University College London, London, United Kingdom; The Hatter Institute, Department of Cardiology (P.S., P.T.), University College Hospitals, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology (N.E., J.S.G.), Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Brighton and Sussex Medical School (M.G., H.C.), East Sussex, United Kingdom.

Correspondence to Peter Taggart, MD, The Hatter Institute, Department of Cardiology, University College Hospital, Grafton Way, London, WC1E 6DB, United Kingdom. E-mail peter.taggart{at}uclh.org

Received April 23, 2008; accepted January 7, 2009.

Background— Dynamic modulation of repolarization is important in arrhythmogenesis. An inverse relation exists in myocardium between activation time (AT) and action potential duration (APD). We hypothesized that resulting gradients of APD and diastolic interval (DI) interact with restitution properties and modulate the timing of repolarization.

Methods and Results— Activation-recovery intervals (ARI) were acquired from reconstructed noncontact unipolar electrograms from the left ventricular endocardium in 9 patients (7 male) with normal ventricles. At a basic paced cycle length (median, 450 ms), ARIs shortened along the path of activation, with a mandatory reciprocal increase of DIs. In the median patient, this range of DIs started at 230 ms at the site of earliest activation and increased to 279 ms at the site of latest activation at a basic cycle length of 450 ms. Four consecutive standard S1 to S2 restitution curves were performed. At sites with a longer ARI (and therefore shorter DI) close to the site of stimulation, premature stimulation produced more shortening of ARIs; therefore, the time course of restitution was steeper than at more distal sites. At normal heart rate, the decrease in ARIs along the conduction pathway compensated for later activation. Thus, dispersion in repolarization time (RT) is smaller than dispersion in ARI in a heart with a steep negative AT–ARI relationship. This protective effect is lost in hearts without such a relationship. In the patients with a steep AT–ARI relationship at basic cycle length, this relation is lost after premature stimulation and is a function of prematurity. Thus, dispersion in RT is larger after shortly coupled extra stimuli in patients with a steep AT–ARI relationship.

Conclusions— A complex interplay exists between activation–repolarization coupling and restitution properties, largely driven by ARI and DI gradients. This plays a significant role in the dynamics of repolarization in humans.

Key Words: arrhythmia • conduction • electrophysiology • repolarisation • restitution


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

The online-only Data Supplement can be found at http://circep.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCEP.108.785352/DC1.


Related Articles

The Modulated Dispersion Hypothesis Confirmed in Humans
Steven Poelzing and David S. Rosenbaum
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009 2: 100-101. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Interaction of Activation–Repolarization Coupling and Restitution Properties in Humans
Ben Hanson, Peter Sutton, Nasser Elameri, Marcus Gray, Hugo Critchley, Jaswinder S. Gill, and Peter Taggart
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009 2: 162-170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolHome page
S. Poelzing and D. S. Rosenbaum
The Modulated Dispersion Hypothesis Confirmed in Humans
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 100 - 101.
[Full Text] [PDF]