Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 6, 2009

Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009
Published online before print March 6, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.778357
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/3/258    most recent
CIRCEP.108.778357v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nordbeck, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nordbeck, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Electrophysiology

Original Article

Feasibility of Real Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging with a Novel Carbon Catheter for Interventional Electrophysiology

Peter Nordbeck1; Wolfgang R. Bauer1; Florian Fidler2; Marcus Warmuth1; Karl-Heinz Hiller2; Matthias Nahrendorf3; Michelle Maxfield4; Sabine Wurtz4; Wolfgang Geistert4; Jens Broscheit1; Peter M. Jakob1 and Oliver Ritter1,5

1 University of Würzburg;
2 Research Center Magnetic-Resonance-Bavaria;
3 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School;
4 Biotronik GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin

5 E-mail: ritter_o{at}medizin.uni-wuerzburg.de

Background—Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers 3D real time imaging with unsurpassed soft tissue contrast without X-ray exposure. To minimize safety concerns and imaging artifacts in MR guided interventional EP, we aimed at developing a setup including catheters for ablation therapy based on carbon technology.

Methods and Results—The setup, including a steerable carbon catheter, was tested for safety, image distortion, and feasibility of diagnostic EP studies and radiofrequency ablation at 1.5 Tesla. MR imaging was performed in three different 1.5-T whole-body scanners using various receive coils and pulse sequences. To assess unintentional heating of the catheters by radio frequency (RF) pulses of the MR scanner in vitro, a fluoroptic thermometry system was used to record heating at the catheter tip. Programmed stimulation and ablation therapy was performed in eight pigs. There was no significant heating of the carbon catheters while using short, repetitive RF pulses from the MR system. Since there was no image distortion when using the carbon catheters, exact targeting of the lesion sites was possible. Both atrial and ventricular RF-ablation procedures including AV node modulation were performed successfully in the scanner. Potential complications such as pericardial effusion after intentional perforation of the RV free wall during ablation could be monitored in real time as well.

Conclusion—Here we describe a newly developed EP technology for interventional electrophysiology based on carbon catheters. The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated by safety testing and performing EP studies and ablation therapy with carbon catheters in the MRI environment.

Key Words: ablation • electrophysiology • magnetic resonance imaging

Author contributions: Peter Nordbeck, MD, and Wolfgang R Bauer, MD, PhD contributed equally to this work.