Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 10, 2009

Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009
Published online before print February 10, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.782888
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/6    most recent
CIRCEP.108.782888v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bai, R.
Right arrow Articles by Priori, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bai, R.
Right arrow Articles by Priori, S. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrowRelated Articles

Original Article

Yield of Genetic Screening in Inherited Cardiac Channelopathies: How to Prioritize Access to Genetic Testing

Rong Bai1; Carlo Napolitano1; Raffaella Bloise1; Nicola Monteforte1 and Silvia G. Priori2,3

1 Maugeri Foundation, Pavia, Italy;
2 IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, University of Pavia

3 E-mail: spriori{at}fsm.it

Background—Identification of mutations in cardiac ion channel genes concurs to the diagnosis of long QT syndrome (LQTS), Brugada syndrome (BrS) and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). However, since availability of genetic screening is still limited and reimbursement policies are lacking, there is a need of evidence-based criteria to prioritize access to genetic testing for these diseases.

Methods and Results—We determined the yield of genetic testing and cost per positive genotyping in 1394 consecutive probands. Among the 546 patients referred for LQTS-genes screening, those with clinical diagnosis of LQTS had the highest yield (64%) and lowest cost (US $8418) for each positive genotyping. Among 798 individuals screened for mutation on the SCN5A gene, the highest yield was obtained in patients with Type 1 BrS ECG pattern (51/405; 13%) corresponding to a cost of US $21441 per positive genotyping. In conclusive BrS patients the presence of atrioventricular block (OR: 3.3, CI1.8-6.1; P=0.0001) increases the yield (23%) of genotyping and reduces its cost (US$ 11700). Among 175 patients screened on RyR2 gene, those with documented bidirectional ventricular tachycardia had the highest incidence (62%) of mutations and the lowest cost (US $5263) per positive genotyping. Genetic screening of unselected family members of sudden cardiac death victims and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation survivors is largely ineffective (yield of 9%) and costly (US$ 71430 per one positive genotyping).

Conclusions—Genotyping can be performed at reasonable cost in individuals with conclusive diagnosis of LQTS and CPVT, and in patients with Type I BrS ECG with atrioventricular block. These patients should be given priority to access genetic testing.

Key Words: genetics • long-QT syndrome • catecholaminergic VT • Brugada Syndrome


Related Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Genotyping in Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes: Are We Getting Value for the Money?
Arthur A.M. Wilde and Yigal M. Pinto
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009 2: 1-3. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Yield of Genetic Screening in Inherited Cardiac Channelopathies: How to Prioritize Access to Genetic Testing
Rong Bai, Carlo Napolitano, Raffaella Bloise, Nicola Monteforte, and Silvia G. Priori
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009 2: 6-15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]