Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 25, 2009

Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009
Published online before print August 25, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.867978
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/5/504    most recent
CIRCEP.109.867978v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by See, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Koplan, B. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by See, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Koplan, B. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy
Right arrow Electrophysiology

Original Article

Atrial Arrhythmias following Lung Transplantation: Epidemiology, Mechanisms at Electrophysiology Study, and Outcomes

Vincent Y. See; Kurt C. Roberts-Thomson; William G. Stevenson; Phillip C. Camp, Jr. and Bruce A. Koplan1

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

* Corresponding author; email: bkoplan{at}partners.org

Background—Atrial arrhythmias (AA) including atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT) are often observed following cardiothoracic surgery. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and mechanism of AA following lung transplant (LT).

Methods & Results—All patients (127 (pts)) post bilateral sequential LT followed at our institution over 20 years were included. All pts received post-operative rhythm monitoring and clinic visit with ECG at 1, 3, 6, 12 mos, or as needed. AA occurred in 40/127 (31.5%) pts over 4.2 ± 4.1 yrs. AA prevalence at post-op, 1, 3, 6, 12 and >12mo was 24%, 11%, 3%, 2%, 4% and 11%, respectively. Early AA were predominantly AF, while all AA >12mo were AT. Time to 1st AF vs. AT was 11 ± 9 vs. 1485 ± 2462 days (p=0.09). Male gender, age and pre-operative AA predicted any early (<3mo) AA but did not predict late AA. Early AA did not predict late AT. In 4 pts with drug resistant AT, electrophysiology studies found AT involving the PV/LA anastomoses in three pts including donor to recipient conduction in one, border zone macroreentry in two, and cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter in one; all pts were successfully treated with ablation.

Conclusion—AA following LT are common. Although AF is common early, AF is rare following healing of LA incisions which likely result in surgical pulmonary vein isolation with rare exception. This raises the question of whether additional surgical or ablation lines at the time of LT would prevent late AA.

Key Words: catheter ablation • fibrillation • lung • tachyarrhythmias • transplantation