Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2008;1:324-326
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.834879
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixit, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dixit, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrowRelated Article

Editorials

Evolving Strategies in Catheter Ablation of Long-Standing Atrial Fibrillation

Sanjay Dixit, MD, FAHA

From the Cardiovascular Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Correspondence to Sanjay Dixit, MD, 9 Founders Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail sanjay.dixit@uphs.upenn.edu

Key Words: arrhythmia • catheter ablation


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Since its original description in 1998, the technique of catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has undergone several modifications.1 Currently, many operators use an anatomic approach, consisting of circumferential lesions encircling individual or ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs), with additional empirical left atrial ablations (lines), whereas others perform a more PV-specific approach, using entrance and exit block to validate isolation, deferring any additional non-PV lesions, unless clinically indicated.2–7 Despite these differences in technique, there remain remarkable consistencies in the AF outcome data between centers, with overall single-procedure efficacy of ≥70% in achieving long-term arrhythmia control for patients with paroxysmal AF but significantly lower success rates in achieving a similar outcome for patients with persistent or permanent AF. The obvious implications of these observations are that the mechanisms underlying initiation and maintenance of persistent or permanent AF may extend beyond PVs. Although this remains an area of active discussion and debate, it has nevertheless prompted investigators to explore more extensive ablation strategies in these patients.8–10

Article see p 344

Consistent with this trend, in this issue of Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Rostock et al11 report their observations in patients with chronic AF. This was a single-center observational study in which 88 subjects underwent ablation during AF, using a step-wise approach comprising PV isolation followed by extensive left atrial, coronary sinus, and right atrial ablation, targeting areas manifesting continuous or rapid electric activity, local activation gradients, or centrifugal activation patterns. The end point of lesion creation was alteration in local electrogram characteristics, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Is a Biatrial Arrhythmia: Data from Catheter Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Aiming Arrhythmia Termination Using a Sequential Ablation Approach
Thomas Rostock, Daniel Steven, Boris Hoffmann, Helge Servatius, Imke Drewitz, Karsten Sydow, Kai Müllerleile, Rodolfo Ventura, Karl Wegscheider, Thomas Meinertz, and Stephan Willems
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008 1: 344-353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]