Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2009;2:471-473
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.909101
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viles-Gonzalez, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, J. L.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Viles-Gonzalez, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Pacemaker
Right arrowRelated Article

Editorial

Everything Counts in Large Amounts

Device-Detected Atrial High-Rate Arrhythmias

Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez, MD and Jonathan L. Halperin, MD

From The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and The Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.

Correspondence to Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, The Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Fifth Ave at 100th St, New York, NY 10029-6574. E-mail jonathan.halperin@mssm.edu

Key Words: atrial flutter • pacemakers • stroke • atrial fibrillation • implanted arrhythmia devices • Editorials


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Although the risk of stroke associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is comparable to that with persistent (or permanent) AF, the lower representation of patients with paroxysmal AF in clinical trials reduces the confidence of the risk estimate.1 As a group, patients with paroxysmal AF are heterogeneous but typically younger, with less advanced associated cardiovascular disease than those with persistent or permanent AF. Episodes of AF occur daily in some patients but in others are separated by months or even years, and the duration of episodes varies considerably as well. Nevertheless, the threshold burden of paroxysmal AF required to justify chronic anticoagulant therapy has not been clearly defined, and prophylactic therapy is prescribed less consistently for patients with this form of the arrhythmia.2,3 Clinical practice guidelines currently recommend prophylactic antithrombotic therapy based on the axiom that paroxysmal and persistent AF carry similar risks of thromboembolism. The anticoagulation decision is based on clinical features other than the pattern, chronicity, or duration of AF, specifically the presence or absence of associated valvular heart disease, prior thromboembolism, advanced age, hypertension, diabetes, impaired left ventricular function, or heart failure.4

Article see p 474

Even in patients with symptomatic AF, asymptomatic episodes are common.3 In studies of unselected patients based on standard surface ECG recordings, the prevalence of asymptomatic AF ranged from 5% to 20%.5,6 Among the challenges in antithrombotic therapy is identifying patients with asymptomatic paroxysmal AF. Longer-term Holter and event monitoring increases the detection of asymptomatic AF, and in the Prevention of Atrial . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

The Relationship Between Daily Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden From Implantable Device Diagnostics and Stroke Risk: The TRENDS Study
Taya V. Glotzer, Emile G. Daoud, D. George Wyse, Daniel E. Singer, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Christopher Hilker, Clayton Miller, Dongfeng Qi, and Paul D. Ziegler
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009 2: 474-480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]