doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.796599
Controversies in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology |
Importance of Knowing the Genotype and the Specific Mutation When Managing Patients With Long-QT Syndrome
From the Cardiology Division of the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y.
Correspondence to Arthur J. Moss, MD, Heart Research Follow-up Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 653, Rochester, NY 14642-8653. E-mail heartajm{at}heart.rochester.edu
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 Top Introduction Risk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited disorder with prolonged ventricular repolarization and an increased propensity to ventricular tachyarrhythmias of the torsade de pointes type that are responsible for arrhythmogenic syncope and sudden cardiac death.1 During the past 13 years, 10 different genotype forms of LQTS have been identified (LQT1–LQT10), with the most frequent clinical types (LQT1–LQT3) categorized as ion channelopathies.2 The remaining 7 infrequently occurring forms of LQTS (LQT4–LQT10) also affect myocellular ion channel currents either directly or indirectly, but LQT4–LQT10 make up less than 5% of the genotype-identified LQTS. To date, approximately 500 different LQTS mutations have been identified in the 10 LQTS genes, and cellular expression studies of these mutations have elucidated basic electrophysiological mechanisms responsible for the delayed repolarization and the manifest QT prolongation. Different LQTS genes affect different ion current mechanisms, and the clinical course of patients with LQT1–LQT3 genotypes have been shown to be quite different.3 In addition, different mutations on the same LQTS gene may produce different electrophysiological effects. For example, mutations involving the LQT1 gene are all associated with reduction in the repolarizing IKs current, but the magnitude of the reduction in this current can vary considerably among the different LQT1 mutations.4 This variability in the electrophysiological effects of different mutations contributes to the variability in the risk of life-threatening cardiac events that are independent of the manifest QTc interval on the ECG. Thus, knowledge of the LQTS genotype and the associated specific mutations are useful in risk-stratifying individual patients for the selection of appropriate therapy for patient-specific risk-reduction.
Response by Vincent see p 219
Because of the extensive literature that currently exists in LQTS, we will focus on the 3 common forms of LQTS (LQT1–LQT3) and related mutations to make our point that this information is useful in managing patients with LQTS.
|
Risk by Genotype |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionRisk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
By 1995, the 3 major LQT1–LQT3 genetic loci were identified, and shortly thereafter, it was appreciated that the ECG manifestations and the clinical course of LQTS were different among the 3 common genotypes. Each of the 3 LQTS genotypes was associated with somewhat distinctive ECG repolarization features.5 Among affected individuals, the QTonset-c was unusually prolonged in those individuals with LQT3 mutations (lead II QTonset-c: LQT1, 243±73 ms; LQT2, 290±56 ms; LQT3, 341±42 ms; P<0.001); Tamplitude was generally quite small in the LQT2 genotype (lead II Tamplitude, mV: LQT1, 0.37±0.17; LQT2, 0.13±0.07;LQT3, 0.36±0.14; P<0.001); and Tduration was particularly long in LQT1 genotype (lead II Tduration-c, ms: LQT1, 262±65; LQT2, 191±51; LQT3, 187±33; P<0.001).
Life-threatening cardiac events tend to occur under specific circumstances in a gene-specific manner (Figure 1).6 LQT1 patients were shown to experience 68% of their lethal events during exercise, whereas most LQT2 and LQT3 patients experience lethal events during rest or sleep, respectively.6 The triggering role of sympathetic activation in LQT1 patients has important therapeutic implications, because it suggests that protection could be expected by the use of antiadrenergic interventions. It should also be noted that although most events in LQT2 and LQT3 patients occur at rest or during sleep, the triggers associated with lethal events for LQT2 and LQT3 patients show a different pattern because LQT2 patients are particularly sensitive to startling and sudden noises, such as a telephone or alarm clock ring (Figure 1).6
|
In the 246 genotyped patients reported by Zareba et al3 the frequency of cardiac events was significantly higher among subjects with mutations at the LQT1 locus (63%) or the LQT2 locus (46%) than among subjects with mutations at the LQT3 locus (18%) as shown in Figure 2. However, the likelihood of dying during a cardiac event was significantly higher among families with mutations at the LQT3 locus (20%) than among those with mutations at the LQT1 locus (4%) or the LQT2 locus (4%).
|
The genotypic risk is also influenced by age and sex of the patient. Priori et al showed that the genotype of the causative mutation affects the clinical course of the LQTS and modulates the effects of the QTc and sex on clinical manifestations.7 Goldenberg et al8 reported in children aged 1 to 12 years that the 3 major LQTS genotypes were associated with similar risks for life-threatening cardiac events after adjustment for clinical factors (LQT1 versus LQT2: hazard ratio=1.61, P=0.56; LQT3 versus LQT2: hazard ratio=2.37; P=0.49). Similar risk results were observed for the 3 genotypes during adolescence.9 However, in adults aged 18 to 40 years, patients with the LQT2 genotype had a significantly higher cardiac event rate than patients with the other 2 genotypes, and this was especially so in women.10 The risk by genotype was also examined in female patients during their childbearing years.11 Compared with a time period before a woman’s first conception, the pregnancy time was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac events (hazard ratio 0.28, P=0.01), whereas the 9-month postpartum time had an increased risk (hazard ratio 2.7, P<0.001). Genotype analysis showed that women with the LQT2 genotype were more likely to experience a postpartum cardiac event than women with the LQT1 or LQT3 genotype (Figure 3). In the only study looking at the clinical course of patients older than 40 years, Goldenberg et al showed that LQT3 genotype carriers exhibited the highest cumulative lethal event rate (35%) compared with LQT2, LQT1, and genotype negative subjects (24%, 14%, and 10%, respectively; P=0.001).12
|
A summary of the risk of cardiac events by the LQT1–LQT3 genotypes for 4 different age groups is presented in Table 1. The risk for cardiac events is augmented in female LQT2 patients aged 21 to 40 years and in LQT3 patients more than 40 years of age.
|
|
Risk by Mutation Location and Function |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionRisk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
There are 2 proposed molecular mechanisms that may account for reduced potassium currents in patients with KCNQ1 and HERG mutations13,14: (1) coassembly or trafficking abnormalities, in which mutant subunits either do not coassemble with normal subunits or if they do are not transported to the cell membrane, resulting in a net effect of
50% reduction in the number of functional channels (haplotype insufficiency); and (2) formation of defective channels involving mutant subunits, with the altered channel protein transported to the cell membrane, resulting in a >50% reduction in channel function (dominant-negative effect). Knowledge of the functional effects of the mutation and its location have been demonstrated to provide incremental prognostic information to clinical risk factors and the genotype,4 which may be used for improved risk stratification and a more focused management of higher-risk LQTS patients.
Mutations in the KCNQ1 Gene
Prior studies that assessed the functional role of LQT1 mutations have yielded conflicting results, possibly because of sample size limitations.15,16 However, a recent cooperative study comprising 600 LQT1 patients, derived from the US portion of the International LQTS Registry, the Netherlands’ LQTS Registry, and the Japanese LQTS Registry, has facilitated a comprehensive analysis of the clinical aspects of 77 different KCNQ1 mutations categorized by their location, coding type, and type of biophysical ion channel dysfunction.4 The study demonstrated that subjects with mutations having dominant-negative ion current effects had a longer QTc interval and a higher cumulative probability of cardiac events than subjects with mutations resulting in loss of function (haploinsufficiency; Figure 4A). After multivariable adjustment for clinical covariates, subjects with mutations having dominant-negative functional effects exhibited >2-fold increase in the risk for cardiac events (P<0.001) compared with those with haploinsufficiency mutations. The study further demonstrated that the frequency of cardiac events in LQT1 patients is also related to the location and type of the KCNQ1 mutation. Subjects with mutations located in the transmembrane region of the channel had a significantly higher rate of cardiac events than those with mutations located in the C-terminus regions (Figure 4B), and those with missense mutations had a significantly higher event rate than those with nonmissense mutations (Figure 4C).4 It is possible that IKs channels with transmembrane mutations might have reduced responsiveness to the regulator β-adrenergic signaling of the ion conduction pathway with more impairment of shortening of the QTc with exercise-related tachycardia than mutations in the C-terminus region.
|
Mutations in the HERG Gene
The pore region of the HERG channel provides the potassium conductance pathway. Most mutations involving this region are missense mutations with dominant-negative effects on IKr, whereas most mutations in the nonpore regions of HERG are associated with coassembly or trafficking abnormalities resulting in haplotype insufficiency.14 In a study of 201 subjects with a total of 44 different HERG mutations from the International LQTS Registry, subjects harboring pore mutations exhibited a more severe clinical course and experienced a higher frequency of arrhythmia-related cardiac events, occurring at an earlier age than did subjects with nonpore mutations (Figure 5).17 Furthermore, pore mutations were shown to dominate the risk after multivariate adjustment for clinical factors, exhibiting an 11-fold increase in the risk for cardiac events in subjects with QTc at 500 ms and a 16% increase in the pore hazard ratio for each 10-ms increase in QTc.17 Cellular expression studies also implicate the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain within the N-terminus and the cyclic nucleotide binding domain (cNBD) of the C-terminus as important regulators of the biophysical properties of HERG.18–20 However, the clinical risk associated with these mutation sites has not yet been assessed. The US, Japanese, and Netherlands LQTS Registries are currently cooperating in the analysis of the risk associated with additional mutation sites in HERG gene.
|
Mutations in the SCN5A Gene
LQT3 mutations in the SCN5A gene produce a gain of function, through faster recovery from inactivation and/or increase in residual current. These mechanisms produce a small but functionally important enhancement of inward sodium plateau current sufficient to delay repolarization and increase vulnerability of the heart to arrhythmias.21 Preliminary data from the US portion of the International LQTS Registry indicate that the biophysical function and location of the LQT3 location are also important determinants of outcome in this population. These recent findings suggest that the
KPQ mutation, which is located in the intracellular loops and operates through both faster recovery from inactivation and an increase in residual sodium current, is associated with a significantly higher risk for cardiac events than the C-terminus D1790G mutation that has distinct biophysical function effects on steady-state inactivation and intracellular calcium homeostasis.22,23 The US, Japanese, and Netherlands LQTS Registries are currently cooperating in a combined assessment of the risk associated with the location, function, and coding type of LQT3 mutations. |
Risk by Specific Mutation |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionRisk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
Several individual mutations in the LQTS genotypes have been demonstrated to be associated with a more severe clinical course and reduced response to therapy that is not fully explained by the biophysical properties of the mutation. In a cohort study involving individuals from South Africa harboring the same A341V mutation in the KCNQ1 gene, mutation carriers were shown to experience an unusual, severe clinical course, independent of the origin of the families, and to be at higher risk for cardiac events compared with a more general LQT1 population. Importantly, patients who harbored the A341V mutation experienced a higher frequency of recurrent cardiac events despite β-blocker therapy.24 Furthermore, a recent study, comprising 78 A341V mutation carriers from 21 families and 8 countries,25 showed that A341V is associated with a significantly higher arrhythmic risk compared with non-A341V LQT1 mutations with a dominant-negative effect or other LQT1 transmembrane mutations despite the fact that A341V was shown to exert only a relatively mild dominant-negative effect. Individual mutations may also contribute independently to risk in LQT2 patients. Rossenbacker et al have identified a novel nonpore missense mutation (K28E) in the PAS domain of the KCNH2 channel that is associated with a malignant phenotype,26 and Crotti et al27 showed that the clinically latent nonpore KCNH2-A1116V mutation exhibits a severe clinical phenotype among patients who coexpress the common K897T KCNH2 polymorphism. These findings suggest that cellular electrophysiological studies cannot always predict the clinical phenotype and that data regarding individual LQTS mutations and associated polymorphisms in modifier genes may be used to identify high-risk patients with this genetic disorder who may have attenuated response to medical therapy.
|
Therapy by Genotype and Mutation |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionRisk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
The main therapeutic modalities for the prevention of life-threatening cardiac events include β-blockers, left cervico-thoracic sympathetic denervation (LCSD), and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In nongenotyped patients, β-blockers comprise the mainstay therapy, whereas LCSD and implantation of an ICD are therapeutic options in high-risk LQTS patients who experience recurrent cardiac events despite β-blocker therapy. Genetic data can be used to provide an improved therapeutic management plan that is individualized by knowledge of genotype-specific and mutation-specific risk factors, prevention measures, and therapies. A proposed therapeutic regimen for each of the 3 major LQTS genotypes is considered separately below and is summarized in Table 2.28
|
LQT1 Patients
Life-threatening events occur during sympathetic activation in patients with this genotype and, therefore, this patient subset benefits from appropriate lifestyle modifications and are effectively protected by the use of antiadrenergic interventions. LQT1 patients should not be allowed to participate in competitive sports. Swimming is particularly hazardous as 99% of the arrhythmic episodes associated with swimming were shown to occur in patients with this genotype.29 Patients who are identified as carriers of the LQT1 genotype should be treated with β-blockers. Priori et al30 observed in a group of 187 LQT1 patients who were treated with β-blockers a very low rate of life-threatening cardiac events (1.2%) during a median-term follow-up period of 4.7 years. Implantation of an ICD and/or LCSD should be considered in high-risk LQT1 patients, especially those harboring dominant negative and/or transmemebrane mutations who exhibit phenotypic QT prolongation and recent syncope despite β-blocker therapy. Because LQT1 patients are most sensitive to sympathetic stimulation, LCSD is expected to be most effective in this population. In a study of 147 patients who underwent LCSD, Schwartz et al31 showed that the procedure was associated with a significant long-term reduction in the frequency of aborted cardiac arrest and syncope but was not entirely effective in preventing sudden death. However, LQT1 patients in the study were shown to experience a very low rate of life-threatening cardiac events after LCSD (1 event per 100 person-years). Recent data from the LQTS-ICD Registry demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the implantable defibrillator in combination with β-blockers in LQT1 patients: in a subset of 69 (36%) patients, from the LQTS-ICD Registry, who were genotyped, none of the LQT1 patients who received combined ICD and β-blocker therapy died or experienced appropriate ICD therapy during a median follow-up of 6 years, whereas the rate of appropriate ICD therapy among LQT2 patients during the same time period was 24%.32,33
LQT2 Patients
Preventive measures in LQT2 patients include avoidance of unexpected auditory stimuli in the bedroom that can cause a startle reaction because these may be associated with lethal events, especially during rest or sleep. The efficacy of β-blocker therapy in LQT2 patients is lower than in patients with the LQT1 genotype. In the study of Priori et al30 27 of 120 (23%) LQT2 patients experienced a cardiac event during follow-up, and the adjusted risk of cardiac events among LQT2 patients was significantly higher (HR=2.91; P=0.001) as compared with LQT1 patients. Similarly, the benefit of LCSD in this population may be more limited: Schwartz et al31 reported that the combined incidence of aborted cardiac arrest of sudden cardiac death after LCSD was 3-fold higher among LQT2 patients as compared with LQT1 patients. Thus, high-risk LQT2 patients (eg, those with pore mutations with concomitant phenotypic QT prolongation and recent syncope and symptomatic adult females) should be considered for early ICD implantation.
LQT2 patients are especially vulnerable when their potassium levels are low because IKr is sensitive to extracellular potassium level. Experimental wedge studies suggested that an increase in extracellular potassium can limit the development of an arrhythmogenic substrate under long-QT conditions.34 Furthermore, in clinical practice, exogenously administered potassium was reported to correct repolarization abnormalities in patients with IKr defects,35 and long-term oral potassium administration was recently shown to improve repolarization abnormalities in LQT2 patients.36 Therefore, efforts should be made to maintain a serum potassium level >4 mEq/L in patients with this genotype.
LQT3 Patients
Data regarding management of LQT3 patients are more limited. Patients harboring this genotype have excessive further prolongation of the QT intervals at slow heart rates,37 and the QTc was shown to prolong even further during the night when heart rate decreases.38 Thus, a reduction in heart rate with β-blockers may pose a therapeutic problem in this population. Accordingly, β-blocker therapy in this population was shown to be associated with a relatively high rate of residual events, and the efficacy of this mode of medical therapy is lower in LQT3 patients compared with those with the other 2 main LQTS genotypes.30,39 In the study of Priori et al30 9 of 28 (32%) LQT3 patients experienced a cardiac event while on β-blocker therapy and the adjusted risk for a cardiac event among LQT3 patients was 4-fold higher than among LQT1 patients.
As most SCN5A mutations increase a late Na+ inward current, sodium channel blockers may shorten the QT interval in LQT3 patients. Administration of the sodium-channel blocker mexiletine was shown to shorten the QT interval by an average of 90 ms.37 However, the response to mexiletine was not consistent and was shown to be mutation specific.40 Similarly, the effectiveness of flecainide, a class IC sodium channel blocker, in this population was also demonstrated to be mutation specific.41,42 Benhorin et al41 demonstrated that administration of flecainide abbreviated the QT interval in LQT3 patients with the D1790G mutation in SCN5A, and Windle et al42 showed that oral flecainide shortened the QTc interval and normalized the repolarization T-wave pattern patients with SCN5A-KPQ mutation. The antianginal agent ranolazine reduces late sodium channel current, shortens the action potential duration, and suppresses early after-depolarization-triggered arrhythmias in animal models of LQT3 with sustained inward sodium current.43 In a recent study, we have shown that therapeutic concentrations of ranolazine were associated with a dose-dependent shortening of QTc interval and improved diastolic relaxation in patients with the LQT3-KPQ mutation.44 Thus, a possible management strategy in LQT3 patients may be to assess the degree of QT shortening produced by an oral sodium channel blocker or ranolazine and to initiate medical therapy in combination with a β-blocker in patients who respond with QTc shortening of 
50 ms. It should be noted, however, that data regarding the clinical efficacy of sodium channel blockers and ranolazine in LQT3 patients are limited, and an electrocardiographic response may not correlate with clinical response in LQT3 carriers. Thus, because of limited long-term clinical data regarding the benefit of medical therapy in LQT3 patients, together with the fact that the lethality among carriers of this genotype is higher than in LQT1 and LQT2 patients,3 early ICD implantation should be encouraged more aggressively in symptomatic LQT3 patients than among patients with the LQT1 or LQT2 genotypes.
|
Conclusion |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionRisk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
Patients with LQTS are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death, with the risk probability influenced by a number of phenotypic and genotypic factors. Optimal drug and/or device therapy to reduce the probability of a fatal event should be tailored to the magnitude of the perceived risk and to amelioration of the risk mechanisms involved in life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. During the past decade, various genetic and mutation-related risk mechanisms have been identified, and the available studies indicate that this genotype-specific information should be used in the selection of therapy to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with LQTS.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported in part by research grants HL-33843 and HL-51618 from the NIH, Bethesda, MD, and by research grants to the University of Rochester from Medtronic Inc., Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Inc., and BioReference Laboratories, Inc.; Dr Ilan Goldenberg received salary support from the Mirowski-Moss Career Development Award while a faculty member at the University of Rochester Medical Center.
Disclosures
Dr Moss received an honorarium when he served in the past year as member of an advisory group for Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Inc.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionRisk by GenotypeRisk by Mutation Location...Risk by Specific MutationTherapy by Genotype and...ConclusionReferences |
|---|
1. Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, Tzivoni D, Locati EH, MacCluer J, Hall WJ, Weitkamp L, Vincent GM, Garson A, Jr. The long QT syndrome: prospective longitudinal study of 328 families. Circulation. 1991; 84: 1136–1144.
2. Roden DM. Clinical practice. Long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 169–176.
3. Zareba W, Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Vincent GM, Robinson JL, Priori SG, Benhorin J, Locati EH, Towbin JA, Keating MT, Lehmann MH, Hall WJ. Influence of genotype on the clinical course of the long-QT syndrome. International Long-QT Syndrome Registry Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 960–965.
4. Moss AJ, Shimizu W, Wilde AA, Towbin JA, Zareba W, Robinson JL, Qi M, Vincent GM, Ackerman MJ, Kaufman ES, Hofman N, Seth R, Kamakura S, Miyamoto Y, Goldenberg I, Andrews ML, McNitt S. Clinical aspects of type-1 long-QT syndrome by location, coding type, and biophysical function of mutations involving the KCNQ1 gene. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2481–2489.
5. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Benhorin J, Locati EH, Hall WJ, Robinson JL, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, Lehmann MH. ECG T-wave patterns in genetically distinct forms of the hereditary long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1995; 92: 2929–2934.
6. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, Moss AJ, Vincent GM, Napolitano C, Denjoy I, Guicheney P, Breithardt G, Keating MT, Towbin JA, Beggs AH, Brink P, Wilde AA, Toivonen L, Zareba W, Robinson JL, Timothy KW, Corfield V, Wattanasirichaigoon D, Corbett C, Haverkamp W, Schulze-Bahr E, Lehmann MH, Schwartz K, Coumel P, Bloise R. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation. 2001; 103: 89–95.
7. Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Napolitano C, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, Grillo M, Vicentini A, Spazzolini C, Nastoli J, Bottelli G, Folli R, Cappelletti D. Risk stratification in the long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1866–1874.
8. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Peterson DR, McNitt S, Zareba W, Andrews ML, Robinson JL, Locati EH, Ackerman MJ, Benhorin J, Kaufman ES, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Qi M, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent MG, Zhang L. Risk factors for aborted cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death in children with the congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2008; 117: 2184–2191.
9. Hobbs JB, Peterson DR, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Goldenberg I, Qi M, Robinson JL, Sauer AJ, Ackerman MJ, Benhorin J, Kaufman ES, Locati EH, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, Zhang L. Risk of aborted cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death during adolescence in the long-QT syndrome. JAMA. 2006; 296: 1249–1254.
10. Sauer AJ, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Peterson DR, Zareba W, Robinson JL, Qi M, Goldenberg I, Hobbs JB, Ackerman MJ, Benhorin J, Hall WJ, Kaufman ES, Locati EH, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, Zhang L. Long QT syndrome in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 329–337.
11. Seth R, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Andrews ML, Qi M, Robinson JL, Goldenberg I, Ackerman MJ, Benhorin J, Kaufman ES, Locati EH, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, Zhang L. Long QT syndrome and pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1092–1098.
12. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Peterson DR, Bradley J, Polonski S, McNitt S, Zareba W, Andrews ML, Robinson JL, Locati EH, Ackerman MJ, Benhorin J, Kaufman ES, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Qi M, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, Zhang L. Long-QT syndrome after age 40. Circulation. 2008; 117: 2192–2201.
13. Shalaby FY, Levesque PC, Yang WP, Little WA, Conder ML, Jenkins-West T, Blanar MA. Dominant-negative KvLQT1 mutations underlie the LQT1 form of long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1733–1736.
14. January CT, Gong Q, Zhou Z. Long-QT syndrome: cellular basis and arrhythmia mechanism in LQT2. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000; 11: 1413–1418.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Zareba W, Moss AJ, Sheu G, Kaufman ES, Priori S, Vincent GM, Towbin JA, Benhorin J, Schwartz PJ, Napolitano C, Hall WJ, Keating MT, Qi M, Robinson JL, Andrews ML. Location of mutation in the KCNQ1 and phenotypic presentation of long QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14: 1149–1153.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Shimizu W, Horie M, Ohno S, Takenaka K, Yamaguchi M, Shimizu M, Washizuka T, Aizawa Y, Nakamura K, Ohe T, Aiba T, Miyamoto Y, Yoshimasa Y, Towbin JA, Priori SG, Kamakura S. Mutation site-specific differences in arrhythmic risk and sensitivity to sympathetic stimulation in the LQT1 form of congenital long QT syndrome: multicenter study in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 117–125.
17. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Kaufman ES, Gartman E, Peterson DR, Benhorin J, Towbin JA, Keating MT, Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Vincent GM, Robinson JL, Andrews ML, Feng C, Hall WJ, Medina A, Zhang L, Wang Z. Increased risk of arrhythmic events in long-QT syndrome with mutations in the pore region of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium channel. Circulation. 2002; 105: 794–799.
18. Akhavan A, Atanasiu R, Noguchi T, Han W, Holder N, Shrier A. Identification of the cyclic-nucleotide-binding domain as a conserved determinant of ion channel cell-surface localization. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 2803–2812.
19. Cui J, Kagan A, Qin D, Mathew J, Melman YF, McDonald TV. Analysis of the cyclic nucleotide binding domain of the HERG potassium channel and interactions with KCNE2. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 17244–17251.
20. Chen J, Zou A, Splawski I, Keating MT, Sanguinetti MC. Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain of HERG potassium channels accelerate channel deactivation. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 10113–10118.
21. Dumaine R, Wang Q, Keating MT, Hartmann HA, Schwartz PJ, Brown AM, Kirsch GE. Multiple mechanisms of Na+ channel-linked long-QT syndrome. Circ Res. 1996; 78: 916–924.
22. An RH, Wang XL, Kerem B, Benhorin J, Medina A, Goldmit M, Kass RS. Novel LQT-3 mutation affects Na+ channel activity through interactions between 
- and β1-subunits. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 141–146.
23. Wehrens XH, Abriel H, Cabo C, Benhorin J, Kass RS. Arrhythmogenic mechanism of an LQT-3 mutation of the human heart Na(+) channel -subunit: a computational analysis. Circulation. 2000; 102: 584–590.
24. Brink PA, Crotti L, Corfield V, Goosen A, Durrheim G, Hedley P, Heradien M, Geldenhuys G, Vanoli E, Bacchini S, Spazzolini C, Lundquist AL, Roden DM, George AL, Jr, Schwartz PJ. Phenotypic variability and unusual clinical severity of congenital long-QT syndrome in a founder population. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2602–2610.
25. Crotti L, Spazzolini C, Schwartz PJ, Shimizu W, Denjoy I, Schulze-Bahr E, Zaklyazminskaya EV, Swan H, Ackerman MJ, Moss AJ, Wilde AA, Horie M, Brink PA, Insolia R, De Ferrari GM, Crimi G. The common long-QT syndrome mutation KCNQ1/A341V causes unusually severe clinical manifestations in patients with different ethnic backgrounds: toward a mutation-specific risk stratification. Circulation. 2007; 116: 2366–2375.
26. Rossenbacker T, Mubagwa K, Jongbloed RJ, Vereecke J, Devriendt K, Gewillig M, Carmeliet E, Collen D, Heidbüchel H, Carmeliet P. Novel mutation in the Per-Arnt-Sim domain of KCNH2 causes a malignant form of long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2005; 111: 961–968.
27. Crotti L, Lundquist AL, Insolia R, Pedrazzini M, Ferrandi C, De Ferrari GM, Vicentini A, Yang P, Roden DM, George AL, Jr, Schwartz PJ. KCNH2-K897T is a genetic modifier of latent congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1251–1258.
28. Shimizu W. The long QT syndrome: therapeutic implications of a genetic diagnosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 67: 347–356.
29. Moss AJ, Robinson JL, Gessman L, Gillespie R, Zareba W, Schwartz PJ, Vincent GM, Benhorin J, Heilbron EL, Towbin JA, Priori SG, Napolitano C, Zhang L, Medina A, Andrews ML, Timothy K. Comparison of clinical and genetic variables of cardiac events associated with loud noise versus swimming among subjects with the long QT syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 876–879.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Schwartz PJ, Grillo M, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, Moncalvo C, Tulipani C, Veia A, Bottelli G, Nastoli J. Association of long QT syndrome loci and cardiac events among patients treated with β-blockers. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1341–1344.
31. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Cerrone M, Spazzolini C, Odero A, Napolitano C, Bloise R, De Ferrari GM, Klersy C, Moss AJ, Zareba W, Robinson JL, Hall WJ, Brink PA, Toivonen L, Epstein AE, Li C, Hu D. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation in the management of high-risk patients affected by the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1826–1833.
32. Zareba W, Moss AJ, Daubert JP, Hall WJ, Robinson JL, Andrews M. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator in high-risk long QT syndrome patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14: 337–341.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Zareba W, Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Daubert J, McNitt S, Polonsky S, Mykins M. Efficacy and safety of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in long QT syndrome patients. Circulation. 2006; 114 (II): 560–561Abstract.[CrossRef]
34. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the normal T wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of the long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1928–1936.
35. Compton SJ, Lux RL, Ramsey MR, Strelich KR, Sanguinetti MC, Green LS, Keating MT, Mason JW. Genetically defined therapy of inherited long-QT syndrome. Correction of abnormal repolarization by potassium. Circulation. 1996; 94: 1018–1022.
36. Etheridge SP, Compton SJ, Tristani-Firouzi M, Mason JW. A new oral therapy for long QT syndrome: long-term oral potassium improves repolarization in patients with HERG mutations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1777–1782.
37. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Locati EH, Napolitano C, Cantù F, Towbin JA, Keating MT, Hammoude H, Brown AM, Chen LS. Long QT syndrome patients with mutations on the SCN5A and HERG genes have differential responses to Na+ channel blockade and to increases in heart rate: implications for gene-specific therapy. Circulation. 1995; 92: 3381–3386.
38. Stramba-Badiale M, Priori SG, Napolitano C, Locati EH, Viñolas X, Haverkamp W, Schulze-Bahr E, Goulene K, Schwartz PJ. Gene-specific differences in the circadian variation of ventricular repolarization in the long QT syndrome: a key to sudden death during sleep? Ital Heart J. 2000; 1: 323–328.[Medline]
39. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, Benhorin J, Vincent GM, Locati EH, Priori SG, Napolitano C, Medina A, Zhang L, Robinson JL, Timothy K, Towbin JA, Andrews ML. Effectiveness and limitations of beta-blocker therapy in congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2000; 101: 616–623.
40. Ruan Y, Liu N, Bloise R, Napolitano C, Priori SG. Gating properties of SCN5A mutations and the response to mexiletine in long-QT syndrome type 3 patients. Circulation. 2007; 116: 1137–1144.
41. Benhorin J, Taub R, Goldmit M, Kerem B, Kass RS, Windman I, Medina A. Effects of flecainide in patients with new SCN5A mutation: mutation-specific therapy for long-QT syndrome? Circulation. 2000; 101: 1698–1706.
42. Windle R, Geletka RC, Moss AJ, Zareba W, Atkins DL. Normalization of ventricular repolarization with flecainide in long QT syndrome patients with SCN5A: DeltaKPQ mutation. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001; 6: 153–158.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Song Y, Shryock JC, Wu L, Belardinelli L. Antagonism by ranolazine of the pro-arrhythmic effects of increasing late INa in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004; 44: 192–199.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Schwarz KQ, Rosero S, McNitt S, Robinson JL. Ranolazine shortens repolarization in patients with sustained inward sodium current due to type-3 long QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Eletrophysiol. 2008, In press.
Key Words: long-QT syndrome • risk factors • arrhythmia • genetics
G. Michael Vincent, MD
I appreciate the fine article by Drs Moss and Goldenberg. In addition to their many outstanding contributions, their article has confirmed my conclusions that, at present, there is no genotype-specific therapy in LQTS and that genotyping plays a minor role in selecting therapy for LQTS patients. Table 2 shows the confirmation. Both the ICD and LCSD treatments are represented as effective and to the same degree in all three genotypes. β-Blockers are represented as very effective in LQT1 and quite effective in LQT2, so they are not genotype specific either; however, these two genotypes cause roughly 95% of LQT1–3 LQTS, so β-blockers are effective and safe therapy in the majority of LQTS patients. Potassium, mexiletine, flecainide, and ranolazine have not been shown to prevent sudden death or cardiac arrest, so we cannot assume that they are effective or genotype-specific therapy nor should we accept that they are appropriate for primary therapy. Drs. Moss and Goldenberg primarily focus their excellent discussion on data showing that the genotype, the mutation location and function, and the specific mutation involved influence the risk of cardiac events in populations of LQTS patients. Be that as it may, there is no data to show that "therapy by genotype or mutation" improves outcome over nonspecific therapy in patients with the "higher risk" genetic findings. At present, the tremendous variability of expression of symptoms in patients with the same genotype and mutation type, as shown in my discussion, indicates that these findings are unlikely to be useful for selecting therapy in individual patients. Furthermore, the risk of sudden death or cardiac arrest is low in the most recent reports. Importantly, these data are essentially the natural history for many of the patients in these studies, because only about 30% received β-blockers, some may not have taken the β-blocker regularly or at all, and just a small percent received ICDs or LCSD. Any consistent application of the known effective therapies will reduce the rate of events even further, particularly if applied to presymptomatic patients and during the high-risk years.
Response to Moss and Goldenberg
Received June 3, 2008; accepted June 12, 2008.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association. This article is Part I of a 2-part article. Part II appears on page 227.
Related Article
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008 1: 219-226.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||