Advances in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Disease (T.Y., G.N.K.) and Department of Pathology (S.H.L.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
Correspondence to Takumi Yamada, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, VH B147, 1670 University Boulevard, 1530 3rd AVE S, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail takumi-y{at}fb4.so-net.ne.jp
Received June 17, 2008; accepted September 4, 2008.
Key Words: left ventricular ostium ventricular arrhythmia aortic cusp catheter ablation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Anatomy of the LV Ostium |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
30% above the horizontal plane with the noncoronary cusp (NCC) most inferiorly and the left coronary cusp (LCC) most superiorly (Figures 1 and 3
15 mm from the nadir of the cusp (Figure 3C).2
|
|
|
1 cm above the base of either cusp. Although VAs can be ablated either above or below the aortic valve, it is the myocardium of the LV ostium that is the target for ablation.
The NCC forms the posterior and right lateral portion of the anterior division of the LV ostium (Figures 2 and 3
B).2 The NCC forms a direct continuum with the anterior leaflet of the MV at the intervalvular trigone, which demarcates the anterior from posterior divisions of the LV ostium (Figures 1, 2, and 3![]()
A). The most inferior portion of the NCC is in contact with the membranous portion of the interventricular septum where it comes in close apposition to the penetrating bundle of His (Figure 5A). Because of this close proximity, a catheter recording His bundle (HB) activation across the tricuspid annulus marks the inferior extent of the NCC. At approximately its midpoint and slightly more superiorly, the NCC is attached to the interatrial septum (Figure 3A and 3B). Therefore, a catheter positioned in the NCC usually records a large atrial electrogram and a much smaller far-field ventricular electrogram. The 3 ASCs are in direct contact a mean of 13.5±1.8 mm above the base of the cusps where apposition in diastole is reinforced by the triangular nodule of Arantius.2
The Posterior Division of the Aorto-Ventricular Membrane Within the LV Ostium
The posterior division of the aorto-ventricular membrane occupies
2/3 of the surface area of the LV ostium (Figures 1 and 2
).2 The 4 components of the posterior division of this membrane includes (1) the MV (the central portion), (2) intervalvular trigone, (3) LFT, and (4) subvalvular segment of the aorto-ventricular membrane (Figure 5A and 5B). The left side of the anterior leaflet of the MV is joined to the LCC by a triangular membrane, the LFT, whereas the right side of that is joined to the NCC at the right fibrous trigone (Figure 2). Rather than forming a true annulus fibrosus, fibrous extensions of the aorto-ventricular membrane attach to the LFT and right fibrous trigone (fila of Henle). The MV is anchored to the aorto-ventricular membrane rather than directly to the LV (Figure 2). Because the left atrium attaches to the aorto-ventricular membrane central to the periphery of aorto-ventricular membrane overlying the LV ostium (Figure 5A), there is a portion of this membrane that lies between the MV and LV myocardium (Figures 2 and 5
B). Thus, the tip of a catheter must be positioned beneath the MV, between the valve and myocardium, to directly contact the LV ostium. The posterior leaflet of the MV forms the most posterior portion of the aorto-ventricular membrane.
| Clinical Presentation of VAs Originating From the LV Ostium |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The LCC was the most common aortic root location, followed by the RCC and L-RCC.4,5,10,11 Although rare reports have described NCC VAs,4,12 these VAs might have actually originated from the RCC. Based on the anatomy of the NCC, VAs should rarely arise from this site.11 The MA VAs more commonly originated from the anterior and antero-lateral portions than from the posterior and postero-septal portions in all case series.6,7
Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VAs occur more frequently in women than men, although men consistently predominate with LV ostial VAs.6,7,11,13 Premature ventricular contractions have been more common than ventricular tachycardias.6,7,11
| Electrocardiographic Characteristics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Electrophysiological Characteristics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When the electrocardiographic characteristics cannot completely exclude the possibility of right ventricular VAs, mapping in the RVOT and right ventricular HB region should be first performed. Activation mapping seeking the earliest bipolar activity or a local unipolar QS pattern during VAs is most reliable for identifying the site of origin. Pace mapping is helpful for MA VAs just as it is for RVOT VAs,1,6,7 but may be less helpful for aortic root VAs because pacing in the aortic root may not exactly reproduce the QRS morphology of the VAs16 or obtain myocardial capture despite the use of high pacing current.
Preferential Conduction and the Relevant Myocardial Fibers in the LVOT
The reason why pace mapping or some algorithms using electrocardiographic characteristics may be less reliable for LVOT than RVOT VAs may be explained by preferential conduction within the LVOT.16,23 Preferential conduction in the LVOT often leads to a discrepancy between the best pace mapping site and successful ablation site. As a result, the ablation is more accurately guided by recording the earliest site of ventricular activation during the VAs than pace mapping, which may identify the preferential breakout site but not the origin. In
25% of the patients with aortic root VAs, there was a localized preferential breakout site in the RVOT. The mechanism of this preferential conduction may be explained by anisotropic conduction between the aortic root origin and breakout site in the RVOT. However, multiple myocardial fibers traveling from the LVOT to the RVOT or other LVOT sites and the endocardial or epicardial surfaces may occur with preferential conduction.16,23,24 Because in our experience multiple breakout sites can often be recorded and the breakout site(s) may be wide, catheter ablation is most reliably accomplished by targeting the origin itself.16,23,24
The RCC and NCC VAs and Transseptal Conduction
Far-field ventricular electrograms reflecting the activity of origins in the RCC or NCC are often recorded in the right ventricular HB region.17 When far-field ventricular electrograms preceding the near-field ventricular electrograms are recognized during VAs, they may be an indicator of a VA origin in the RCC or NCC. However, in some VAs with an RCC or NCC origin, these far-field ventricular electrograms are difficult to recognize because the near-field ventricular electrograms overlap with them due to a relatively short transeptal conduction time.17 When the earliest right ventricular activation suggests an origin near the HB, mapping of the RCC and NCC is required to determine whether the origin is truly from the RV or whether earlier activation can be recorded in the aortic root to decrease the risk of inadvertent damage to the AV conduction system.
Characteristic Local Electrograms at the Successful Ablation Site
In >90% of the aortic root VAs5,25 and 40% to 80% of the MA VAs,6,7 a 2-component electrogram with the earliest deflection preceding the QRS onset of the VAs was recorded at the successful ablation site (87% of the aortic root VAs, 75% of the GCV VAs, and 62% of the MA VAs in our case series; Figure 7). The first component of the electrogram (prepotential) is usually the smaller and higher frequency potential that precedes the QRS onset whereas the second component is a larger potential and occurs simultaneously with the QRS onset. The mechanism of those prepotentials remains unknown. However, prepotentials may represent activation of myocardial fibers connecting the VA origin to the breakout site or the VA origin itself and the second potential the activation of the local myocardium at the breakout site. In some VAs, especially arising from the LCC, an isoelectric line has been observed between those 2 potentials (Figure 7), and in others, a fractionated electrogram has connected the 2 potentials.5–7,10,11,25 The extensive fibrous tissue present between the base of the LCC and LV myocardium (Figure 4B) suggests that an insulated myocardial fiber may exist between the VA origin and breakout site which may have slow conduction properties. Such fibrosis appears to be less significant at the base of the RCC (Figure 4A). Interestingly, in our case series, a prepotential was never recorded at the successful ablation site in any AMC VAs. This finding may suggest that prepotentials may result from activation of a low mass of myocardial fibers surrounded by interstitial fibrous strands as can be seen in histological sections (Figure 4B). In sections through the LV ostium, the ventricular myocardium becomes progressively thinner closer to the aortic and mitral valves. These anatomic characteristics of the LV ostium may allow for an appearance of a prepotential in the VAs.
The local ventricular activation at the successful ablation site preceded the QRS onset by an average of 30 to 40 ms.4–7,10,11,25 In many of the LV ostial VAs, a local atrial electrogram, which was smaller than the ventricular electrogram, was recorded at the successful ablation site.6,7,11 However, in the NCC VAs, the local atrial electrogram is usually larger than the ventricular electrogram at the successful ablation site.17
| Catheter Ablation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an endocardial approach or epicardial approach via the cardiac veins or subxiphoid access, RF catheter ablation may be limited in those VAs because of the inaccessibility or high impedance within the venous system or because the VA origins are located intramurally, close to the coronary artery, or epicardially underneath a fat pad. Cryo-thermal ablation may be an alternative to RF ablation in cases with high impedance within the venous system or when the origin is located close to a coronary artery.26 Because the posterior portion of the RVOT is in close apposition to the LV near the aortic root, when catheter ablation has not been successful in the LVOT the RV should be carefully mapped before determining that an epicardial approach is required.
Angiography as a Guide to Catheter Ablation
For catheter ablation above the aortic valve, selective angiography of the coronary artery and aorta should be performed before ablation to avoid arterial injury and precisely define the location of the ablation catheter.11 RF ablation is applied under continuous fluoroscopic observation with an angiographic catheter positioned within the coronary artery. The outline of the ASCs and flow in the coronary artery are observed by hand injections of contrast every 15 seconds. An RF application should never be delivered within 5 mm of the coronary artery. In 2 case series without any complications, the average distance from the tip of the ablation catheter to the left or RCA ostium was 12.2 to 12.9 mm (range, 7.3 to 17.2 mm) and 9.2 to 10.5 mm (range, 8.3 to 18.1 mm), respectively.11,12
The 3 ASCs can be readily identified during biplane aortography or coronary angiography. The LCC is most easily identified in the left anterior oblique projection where this cusp is on the far lateral aspect of the aortic root, leftward, and superior to the HB catheter (Figure 8A). The RCC usually requires coronary angiography in both the right anterior oblique and left anterior oblique projections for accurate identification of the cusp relative to the RCA ostium (Figure 8B). In the right anterior oblique projection, the ablation catheter is typically located anterior and inferior to the RCA ostium. In the left anterior oblique projection, the typical ablation site is more leftward in the cusp than the RCA ostium. The NCC is readily identified as the most inferior of the 3 cusps and by its close relation to the HB catheter. In the right anterior oblique projection (Figure 8C), a catheter in the NCC is posterior and inferior to the RCA ostium, just above the HB catheter. In the left anterior oblique projection (Figure 8C), the NCC is just superior to the HB catheter, well posterior to the RCA ostium. Intracardiac echocardiography may also be useful for identifying the site of the ablation catheter.
|
In the GCV VAs, RF current delivery via the venous system is often limited by high impedance9 and may cause complications such as venostenosis, vein rupture, venous thrombosis, or damage to the adjacent coronary arteries.26 During catheter ablation within the GCV, simultaneous coronary angiography is essential. Although cryo-ablation may be safer than RF ablation in the venous system,26,27 clinical data regarding its efficacy in GCV VAs remain limited.26
Complications
Because the LV ostium occupies the central portion of the heart, ablation in this region is in close proximity to important structures, raising concern for potential complications. The most serious complication is coronary artery injury with inadvertent application of RF current within the coronary arteries being potentially lethal.28 Because of this possibility it is essential that some form of imaging be used to ensure that the ablation catheter is not within or directly overlying a coronary artery. In addition, aortic or mitral regurgitation may occur as a result of mechanical trauma or RF current applied directly to valvular tissue. Although previous studies have reported very low complication rates,4,6,10–12 it should be emphasized that those reports generally have come from highly experienced centers with highly skilled personnel. Transient sinus bradycardia followed by transient complete AV conduction block has been observed during RF ablation within the RCC.11,29 RF energy delivery within the RCC may have a thermal effect on the anterior epicardial fat pad containing parasympathetic ganglia, resulting in vagal stimulation.11,30
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Dr Yamada is supported by research grants from Boston Scientific and St Jude Medical. Dr Kay has participated in catheter research funded by Biosense-Webster and Irvine Biomedical and received honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and St Jude Medical.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. McAlpine WA. Heart and Coronary Arteries. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1975.
3. Callans DJ, Menz V, Schwartzman D, Gottlieb CD, Marchlinski FE. Repetitive monomorphic tachycardia from the left ventricular outflow tract: electrocardiographic patterns consistent with a left ventricular site of origin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1023–1027.[Abstract]
4. Kanagaratnam L, Tomassoni G, Schweikert R, Pavia S, Bash D, Beheiry S, Neibauer M, Saliba W, Chung M, Tchou P, Natale A. Ventricular tachycardias arising from the aortic sinus of valsalva: an under-recognized variant of left outflow tract ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1408–1414.
5. Ouyang F, Fotuhi P, Ho SY, Hebe J, Volkmer M, Goya M, Burns M, Antz M, Ernst S, Cappato R, Kuck KH. Repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia originating from the aortic sinus cusp: electrocardiographic characterization for guiding catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 500–508.
6. Kumagai K, Yamauchi Y, Takahashi A, Yokoyama Y, Sekiguchi Y, Watanabe J, Iesaka Y, Shirato K, Aonuma K. Idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia originating from the mitral annulus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 1029–1036.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Tada H, Ito S, Naito S, Kurosaki K, Kubota S, Sugiyasu A, Tsuchiya T, Miyaji K, Yamada M, Kutsumi Y, Oshima S, Nogami A, Taniguchi K. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia arising from the mitral annulus: a distinct subgroup of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 877–886.
8. Anderson RH. Clinical anatomy of the aortic root. Heart. 2000; 84: 670–673.
9. Yamada T, Yoshida N, Murakami Y, Okada T, Muto M, Murohara T, McElderry HT, Kay GN. Electrocardiographic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias originating from the junction of the left and right coronary sinuses of Valsalva in the aorta: the activation pattern as a rationale for the electrocardiographic characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5: 184–192.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Hachiya H, Aonuma K, Yamauchi Y, Igawa M, Nogami A, Iesaka Y. How to diagnose, locate, and ablate coronary cusp ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 551–556.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Yamada T, McElderry HT, Doppalapudi H, Murakami Y, Yoshida Y, Yoshida N, Okada T, Tsuboi N, Inden Y, Murohara T, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ, Singh SP, Kay GN. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic root: prevalence, electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics, and results of the radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 139–147.
12. Chun KR, Satomi K, Kuck KH, Ouyang F, Antz M. Left ventricular outflow tract tachycardia including ventricular tachycardia from the aortic cusps and epicardial ventricular tachycardia. Herz. 2007; 32: 226–232.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Nakagawa M, Ooie T, Ou B, Ichinose M, Takahashi N, Hara M, Yonemochi H, Saikawa T. Gender differences in autonomic modulation of ventricular repolarization in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 278–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Ito S, Tada H, Naito S, Kurosaki K, Ueda M, Hoshizaki H, Miyamori I, Oshima S, Taniguchi K, Nogami A. Development and validation of an ECG algorithm for identifying the optimal ablation site for idiopathic ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14: 1280–1286.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Kumagai K, Fukuda K, Wakayama Y, Sugai Y, Hirose M, Yamaguchi N, Takase K, Yamauchi Y, Takahashi A, Aonuma K, Shimokawa H. Electrocardiographic characteristics of the variants of idiopathic left ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19: 495–501.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Yamada T, Murakami Y, Yoshida N, Okada T, Shimizu T, Toyama J, Yoshida Y, Tsuboi N, Muto M, Inden Y, Hirai M, Murohara T, McElderry HT, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ, Kay GN. Preferential conduction across the ventricular outflow septum in ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic sinus cusp. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 884–891.
17. Yamada T, McElderry HT, Doppalapudi H, Kay GN. Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias originating from the vicinity of the His bundle: significance of mapping of the aortic sinus cusp. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5: 37–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Ohe T, Shimomura K, Aihara N, Kamakura S, Matsuhisa M, Sato I, Nakagawa H, Shimizu A. Idiopathic sustained left ventricular tachycardia: clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics. Circulation. 1988; 77: 560–568.
19. Nogami A, Naito S, Tada H, Oshima S, Taniguchi K, Aonuma K, Iesaka Y. Verapamil-sensitive left anterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia: results of radiofrequency ablation in six patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: 1269–1278.[Medline]
20. Doppalapudi H, Yamada T, McElderry HT, Plumb VJ, Epstein AE, Kay GN. Ventricular tachycardia originating from the posterior papillary muscle in the left ventricle—a novel clinical syndrome. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2008; 1: 23–29.
21. Dixit S, Gerstenfeld EP, Lin D, Callans DJ, Hsia HH, Nayak HM, Zado E, Marchlinski FE. Identification of distinct electrocardiographic patterns from the basal left ventricle: distinguishing medial and lateral sites of origin in patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2: 485–491.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Daniels DV, Lu YY, Morton JB, Santucci PA, Akar JG, Green A, Wilber DJ. Idiopathic epicardial left ventricular tachycardia originating remote from the sinus of Valsalva: electrophysiological characteristics, catheter ablation, and identification from the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1659–1666.
23. Yamada T, Platonov M, McElderry HT, Kay GN. Left ventricular outflow tract tachycardia with preferential conduction and multiple exits. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2008; 1: 140–142.
24. Yamada T, McElderry HT, Doppalapudi H, Kay GN. Ventricular tachycardia with a myocardial fibre travelling from the origin in the right aortic sinus cusp to the epicardial breakout site of the right ventricular outflow tract. Europace. 2008; 10: 469–470.
25. Tada H, Naito S, Ito S, Kurosaki K, Ueda M, Shinbo G, Hoshizaki H, Oshima S, Taniguchi K, Nogami A. Significance of two potentials for predicting successful catheter ablation from the left sinus of Valsalva for left ventricular epicardial tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004; 27: 1053–1059.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Obel OA, d'Avila A, Neuzil P, Saad EB, Ruskin JN, Reddy VY. Ablation of left ventricular epicardial outflow tract tachycardia from the distal great cardiac vein. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1813–1817.
27. Aoyama H, Nakagawa H, Pitha JV, Khammar GS, Chandrasekaran K, Matsudaira K, Yagi T, Yokoyama K, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Comparison of cryothermia and radiofrequency current in safety and efficacy of catheter ablation within the canine coronary sinus close to the left circumflex coronary artery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 1218–1226.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Pons M, Beck L, Leclercq F, Ferriere M, Albat B, Davy JM. Chronic left main coronary artery occlusion: a complication of radiofrequency ablation of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997; 20: 1874–1876.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Yamada T, Yoshida Y, Inden Y, Murohara T, Kay GN. Vagal reflex provoked by radiofrequency catheter ablation in the right aortic sinus cusp: a Bezold–Jarisch-like phenomenon. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008; available online DOI 10.1007/s10840-008-9292-4.
30. Cummings JE, Gill I, Akhrass R, Dery M, Biblo LA, Quan KJ. Preservation of the anterior fat pad paradoxically decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 994–1000.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |