| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Articles |
From the Auckland Bioengineering Institute (B.J.C., M.L.T., G.B.S., D.A.H., I.J.L., B.H.S.) and the Department of Physiology (I.J.L., B.H.S.), Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Correspondence to Bruce H. Smaill, PhD, Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1001, New Zealand. E-mail b.smaill{at}auckland.ac.nz
Received October 19, 2008; accepted June 8, 2009.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— For the first time, high-density intramural electric mapping (325 electrodes at
4x4x1-mm spacing) from pig left ventricular tissue was used to reconstruct 3D paced activation surfaces projected directly onto 3D tissue structure imaged throughout the same left ventricular volume. These data from 5 hearts demonstrate that ventricular tissue is electrically orthotropic with 3 distinct propagation directions that coincide with local microstructural axes defined by the laminar arrangement of ventricular myocytes. The maximum conduction velocity of 0.67±0.019 ms–1 was aligned with the myofiber axis. However, transverse to this, the maximum conduction velocity was 0.30±0.010 ms–1, parallel to the myocyte layers and 0.17±0.004 ms–1 normal to them. These orthotropic conduction velocities give rise to preferential activation pathways across the left ventricular free wall that are not captured by structurally detailed computer models, which incorporate axially anisotropic electric properties.
Conclusions— Our findings suggest that current views on uniform side-to-side electric coupling in the heart need to be revised. In particular, nonuniform laminar myocardial architecture and associated electric orthotropy should be included in future models of initiation and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmia.
Key Words: anisotropy mapping structure computer modeling intramural pacing
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective on p 433
Normal ventricular myocardium is generally thought to function as a syncytium in which side-to-side electric coupling between adjacent myocytes is uniform.1,2 The electric properties of ventricular myocardium are assumed to be axially anisotropic with respect to the local myofiber axis,1,2 with activation propagating most rapidly in the myofiber direction and at uniform velocity in planes transverse to this.
This view is not consistent with the laminar model of ventricular myocardium that has resulted from detailed morphometric investigations of 3D cardiac tissue architecture.3–5 Ventricular myocardium is described as having a laminar organization in which myocytes are arranged in layers (myolaminae) approximately 4 cells thick. Adjacent layers branch and interconnect but are separated by cleavage planes across which there can be little direct cell-to-cell coupling. The laminar model of myocardial architecture is supported by the findings of numerous analyses of cardiac mechanical function6–8 and by the results of cardiac magnetic resonance diffusion–tensor imaging studies.9,10 A structurally detailed computer model predicted that the laminar architecture of ventricular myocardium will give rise to orthotropic electric properties with slow propagation normal to laminae due to the tortuous conduction paths involved.11 Experimental data that would enable this hypothesis to be tested objectively have not previously been available. The few studies in which attempts have been made to reconstruct 3D intramural electric activation12,13 have not had the spatial resolution nor provided sufficient structural data to address this issue.
This work, for the first time, provides experimental evidence that the spread of electric activation in ventricular myocardium is not axially anisotropic. We demonstrate preferential transmural activation directions that coincide with the orientation of muscle layers across the left ventricular (LV) wall. Conduction is significantly slower perpendicular to muscle layers, suggesting that structural discontinuities affect side-to-side electric coupling.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key features of the study design are represented in Figure 1. Five pigs (weight, 45 to 55 kg) were anesthetized and maintained with halothane (2% to 5%) in oxygen. The heart was exposed, and an array of 25 plunge needles (0.5-mm OD with 13 electrodes at 1-mm spacing; see Rogers14 for details of fabrication) was introduced into the LV free wall. Unipolar extracellular potentials (ECPs), referred to the pulmonary artery root, were acquired (sampling rate, 4 KHz; 12-bit resolution; bandwidth, 0.01 to 2000 Hz) at up to 325 sites using a purpose-developed mapping system (UnEmap, Auckland UniServices Ltd, New Zealand).
|
On completion of the experiment, the heart was arrested, excised with needles in place, and immersed in chilled (4°C) physiological saline solution. Hearts were perfusion-fixed (3% formalin in phosphate buffer), and a transmural segment containing the recording array was removed. T2-weighted MR images of the excised LV segment were acquired at 0.313-mm voxel size (1.5-T Siemens Avantos, MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemans AG Medical Solutions) shortly after fixation. Plunge needles were carefully removed from the heart before MR imaging. Previously measured electrode positions were mapped onto best-fit lines superimposed on the segmented needle tracks to determine 3D electrode locations in vivo.
Activation times were estimated from dV/dTmin for the intrinsic ECP deflection. Where dV/dT exhibited a prolonged plateau or showed fractionation (17% of all pacing data), the principal deflection was identified by convolving the ECP with adjacent signals from the same plunge needle using the high pass filter weights (–0.5 1.0 to 0.5). Activation contours were reconstructed in 3D using Hardy interpolation,15 with R2=0.05. Activation data were interpolated onto a 0.5-mm 3D grid for analysis of activation contours in 2D slices and evolution of the wave front in 3D. The direction of most rapid propagation, defined as the principal axis of activation (PAA), was identified as the longest line through the stimulus site enclosed by the 12-ms isosurface. The spread of activation transverse to the PAA was characterized as follows. In the transverse plane containing the origin of activation, the distance from origin to points on a specified isochronal contour was measured and magnitudes and orientations of local maxima and minima were recorded. Local 3D conduction velocities (CVs) were estimated as follows. Isochronal activation surfaces at 1-ms intervals were interpolated at 0.2-mm grid resolution and vectors normal to these surfaces were determined. The orientation and magnitude of local velocity were given by the direction of the normal vector and the distance along it to the next isochronal surface. Maximum and minimum CVs were extracted from volumes immediately adjacent to the PAA and the transverse plane containing the origin of activation. Activation isosurfaces were constructed and analyzed using MATLAB (MathWorks Inc, Cambridge, Mass).
Tissue architecture was reconstructed in 3D throughout the volume from which intramural potentials were acquired as follows (Figure 2). The excised LV segment was embedded in wax and the entire volume was imaged using techniques described in detail elsewhere.16 In brief, specimens were mounted with the circumferential-radial surface uppermost. This surface was trimmed with an ultramiller to expose the tissue, stained with Toluidine blue (0.12% in 1% borax) to a depth of
2 µm, and imaged at 8.33-µm pixel size using a digital camera. The process of milling, surface staining, and imaging was repeated throughout the volume. The full volume was imaged at 50-µm steps, whereas 16.7-µm steps were used for a 5-mm-wide central subvolume.
|
To determine myofiber orientation, corrected volume images were resliced on XY planes parallel to the epicardial surface, subdivided with a 24x24 pixel grid, and dominant angles in each subregion were extracted (Figure 2B) using a Sobel gradient operator.17 Myolaminar orientations were measured similarly in resliced transmural planes (Figure 2C).
A computer activation model was constructed using surface geometry, myofiber orientations, and electrode locations measured in 1 heart (Figure 2D). Electric properties were assumed to be axially anisotropic, with conductivities of 0.4 and 0.1 mS/mm, respectively, in the fiber direction and transverse to the fiber axis. A monodomain activation model with a cubic ionic current was discretized using finite elements at 0.16-mm resolution and solved on the domain containing the recording array (25x31x18 mm), using a high-performance computer (IBM p595).
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Comparison of grouped data were made using multiway, repeated-measures analysis of variance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Typical activation isosurfaces generated by intramural point stimulation are shown in Figure 1. The spread of activation was initially ellipsoid with the PAA—the direction of most rapid early propagation—typically lying in a plane adjacent to the stimulus site and parallel to the epicardial surface. Activation isochrones are superimposed on tissue structure rendered in this plane (Figure 1C), and it is evident that the PAA aligns with local myofiber direction. However, the spread of activation transverse to the PAA (Figure 1D) is also markedly nonuniform with most rapid propagation at around –20° to the transmural z-axis. This coincides with the orientation of myolaminae in these transmural planes.
Figure 3 shows activation contours generated by stimulation at other intramural sites in the same heart. Panels B and C are XY and transverse planes that contain the stimulus site as outlined above. Again, the spread of activation is elliptical in both planes. The orientation of the PAA varies through
130° in the XY plane as the stimulus is moved progressively across the LV wall (Figure 3B). Transverse to the PAA, activation consistently spreads most rapidly oblique to the transmural z-axis. The correspondence between transverse activation spread in the vicinity of the stimulus and local laminar architecture is shown in Figure 3C. Although the 3D spread of activation was relatively uniform, local inhomogeneity was common. Activation was nonsequential on occasion, and the point of first activation was displaced 1.1±1.3 mm from the stimulus site.
|
15° was also observed. To quantify the spread of activation in this plane, maximum and minimum distances from the point of first activation to the 10-ms activation contour are plotted in polar coordinates across all experiments (Figure 4C). The transverse spread of activation is greatest in the upper right and lower left quadrants of the plane (3.8±1.3 mm and –42±36°) and least in the quadrants at right angles (2.1±0.5 mm and 51±39°). Features to be noted here are the significant differences between maxima and minima and the fact that they cluster in orthogonal orientations. The directions in which activation spreads most rapidly in the transverse plane coincide with the dominant layer orientation.
|
To test further the hypotheses that the electric properties of ventricular myocardium are transversely isotropic and that the intramural spread of activation is determined by principally by myofiber rotation, we implemented an experiment-specific activation model. This incorporates detailed measurements of 3D surface geometry and myofiber orientations throughout the region containing the recording array, and electric properties are assumed to be transversely isotropic with respect to the fiber axis. Predicted and experimental 3D spread of activation are compared directly in Figure 5 for midwall and subendocardial unipolar stimulation. It is evident that the model does not capture key features of corresponding experimental data. The predicted spread of activation in the transverse plane containing the stimulus is relatively circular in the model but is elliptical in the experiment. Although the direction of principal activation spread in transverse planes on either side of the stimulus (A and C) is in opposite directions in the model, this is not seen experimentally. The difference between predicted and observed results is marked for stimuli in subendocardial regions where variation of fiber orientation is relatively small (see Figure 5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
That electric activation propagates most rapidly in the fiber direction is wholly expected and has been shown in numerous studies.2,12,18 Our estimates of both axial and maximum transverse CV are very similar to results reported for ventricular epicardium.2,12 However, anisotropic spread of activation transverse to the fiber axis has not previously been demonstrated. This is because the few studies in which the spread of electric activation has been reconstructed in 3D12,13,19 had insufficient spatial resolution to detect such directional variation. We inserted 325 electrodes at 1-mm transmural spacing into a segment approximately 16x16x12 mm of the anterior free wall in the pig heart. This enabled us to map 3D electric activation with sufficient spatial resolution to reconstruct accurate isochronal contours transverse to the PAA in planes containing the site of first excitation. Transverse activation follows a consistent transmural pattern across all experiments, with maximum and minimum transverse local velocities separating in a ratio
2:1. This is not consistent with the widely held view that the electric properties of ventricular myocardium are isotropic transverse to the fiber axis.
The strong association between the direction of preferential transverse activation and the orientation of laminae in the same transverse plane does not prove that there is a mechanistic link between the two. However, it provides additional support for the view that the laminar architecture of LV myocardium gives rise to orthotropic electric properties. In our initial article reporting laminar arrangement of myocytes in ventricular myocardium,3 we argued that, in the absence of electric coupling across the clefts that separate adjacent layers, the spread of activation perpendicular to laminae would be forced to a follow a relatively tortuous path and therefore occur more slowly than the transverse spread of activation within layers. Hooks et al11 tested this hypothesis in a computer model that incorporated detailed information about laminar structure through the rat LV free wall.5 The model predicted a transverse velocity ratio of 1.68 in the directions parallel with and normal to laminae, respectively. Most recently, Hooks et al20 used a combination of high-resolution intramural electric mapping, detailed structural measurement, and experiment-specific modeling to analyze the passive electric response of LV myocardium to injection of a current pulse. It was found that bulk conductivity transverse to the fiber axis (affected by extracellular and intracellular conductivities) divided in a ratio of approximately 2:1, with maximum bulk conductivity in the direction of myolaminae and minimum conductivity perpendicular to this.
Although most laminae are oriented between –20 to –30° to the transmural z-axis, there are regions with interspersed myolaminae approximately at right angles to this (see Figure 4B), as has been reported elsewhere.3,9,10,20 Although the direction of the principal laminar orientation is surprisingly consistent across all studies, the relative frequency of the second orthogonal direction varies between and within hearts and appears to be greatest in the midwall. This would be expected to introduce a stochastic component into the spread of activation.
An important further question is whether it is necessary to incorporate orthotropic electric properties in computer activation models to capture key features of intramural propagation. The results of computational studies that have sought to address this issue21,22 have been equivocal. Colli-Franzone et al22 have argued that the effects of intramural fiber rotation would mask the orthotropic nature of the medium, particularly for epicardial activation maps. They state that, from a qualitative point of view, both axially anisotropic and orthotropic models are compatible with the experimental findings "... and only a quantitative comparison with the experimental data could provide a means for validating one of the two assumptions." We have used experiment-specific computer modeling to test the hypothesis that it is not necessary to use locally orthotropic electric properties in activation models, because the intramural spread of activation is determined principally by myofiber rotation.
The 3D spread of electric activation in a typical heart has been interpreted using a computer model that assumes transverse isotropy and incorporates detailed information on myofiber orientation and surface geometry in that heart (see Figure 5). The transverse isotropic model predicts a relatively uniform spread of activation in the plane transverse to the fiber direction at the point of activation. In parallel planes in front of and behind the stimulus, however, the predicted spread is elliptical with the major axis of the ellipse in opposite directions due to transmural fiber rotation. These predictions are consistent with the results of Colli-Franzone et al22 for an axially anisotropic medium but fail to reproduce even the qualitative features of experimental data obtained under exactly comparable conditions. The spread of activation in transverse planes in front of and behind the stimulus is in the same direction, whereas differences between predicted and observed results are most marked in subendocardial regions where variation of fiber orientation is relatively small.
Whole-heart computer models of cardiac electric activation23–25 are playing an increasingly important role in aiding understanding of the mechanisms that give rise to reentrant arrhythmia and ventricular fibrillation (VF). Electric anisotropy and structural heterogeneity are clearly implicated in the initiation of ventricular tachycardia, wave break, and the induction of VF.26,27 Moreover, the spatio-temporal characteristics of reentrant wave front dynamics during VF26–28 are all expected to depend on the electric orthotropy of ventricular tissue. Whereas the laminar arrangement of myocytes probably increases conduction safety29 transmurally by minimizing current-load mismatch, intrinsically slow electric propagation perpendicular to myolaminae may contribute to the initiation and maintenance of reentrant arrhythmia, particularly in ischemia. The present study strongly reinforces the view that the nonuniform laminar architecture of myocardium and associated electric orthotropy should be included in future computer models of cardiac arrhythmia.
Possible artifacts introduced by the techniques used in this study warrant careful consideration. First, there is no evidence that introduction of the electrode array has affected the results. During data collection, ST-segment elevation was negligible and results were highly repeatable both within and between experiments. Second, reliable interpretation of the results presented here depends on accurate spatial registration of electric and structural data. Although the 3D locations of individual electrodes were identified with considerable precision using MR imaging, structural data were acquired from wax-embedded specimens that undergo substantial shrinkage and distortion during processing. This deformation was corrected using a mapping procedure that matches features in the wax-embedded specimens with corresponding structures in MR volumes. The effectiveness of this correction is independently corroborated by the near-perfect alignment of the principal axis of propagation with reconstructed myofiber orientation at the stimulus site in all experiments. Third, interpolation of 3D isochrones from activation times at electrodes that are nonuniformly distributed (1-mm spacing along each needle, but around 4 mm spacing between needles) can introduce bias, particularly in the initial phases of activation. We have elected to use a conservative interpolation scheme15 that tends initially to default to isotropic interpolation and have taken pains to identify a value of the R2 fitting parameter that is robust across the experimental data sets used (see Methods). Finally, it could be argued that virtual electrodes generated by intramural stimulation30 may play some role in the 3D activation patterns reported here. We have used near-threshold stimulation in all cases to minimize this possibility and can demonstrate no difference between unipolar and bipolar stimulation. In addition, we are confident that our results are not biased by intramural activation of the specialized conduction system, which has much greater penetration across the LV wall in pigs than in dogs or human beings.31 The transmural spread of activation was relatively uniform, with little evidence of the rapid local spread expected with activation of the conduction system. The spread of excitation was also consistent in magnitude and direction (relative to tissue microstructure) for each of the 13 sites across the LV wall at which intramural stimulation was applied. Moreover, the mean value of the principal velocities estimated transverse to the fiber direction in this study lies within the range of transverse velocities measured on the epicardial surface in the dog.2,12
Limitations
For more detailed analysis of the electric properties of ventricular myocardium, it would be desirable to characterize intramural activation at even higher spatial resolution. Ideally, the data obtained from such a study would be interpreted with a fully orthotropic computer model that incorporates detailed information not only on myofiber orientation and boundary geometry but also the laminar arrangement of myocytes and the distribution of other structures such as coronary blood vessels. This is beyond the scope of the current study, but work is proceeding in each of these areas in our laboratory.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was funded by a programme grant from the Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kleber AG, Rudy Y. Basic mechanisms of cardiac impulse propagation and associated arrhythmias. Physiologic Rev. 2004; 84: 431–488.
3. LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH, Chai LZ, Edgar SG, Gavin JB, Hunter PJ. Laminar structure of the heart: ventricular myocyte arrangement and connective tissue architecture in the dog. Am J Physiology. 1995; 269: H571–H582.[Medline]
4. Young AA, Legrice IJ, Young MA, Smaill BH. Extended confocal microscopy of myocardial laminae and collagen network. J Microsc. 1998; 192: 139–150.[Medline]
5. Sands GB, Gerneke DA, Hooks DA, Green CR, Smaill BH, Legrice IJ. Automated imaging of extended tissue volumes using confocal microscopy. Micros Res Technique. 2005; 67: 227–239.[CrossRef]
6. LeGrice IJ, Takayama Y, Covell JW. Transverse shear along myocardial cleavage planes provides a mechanism for normal systolic wall thickening. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 182–193.
7. Costa KD, Takayama Y, McCulloch AD, Covell JW. Laminar fiber architecture and three-dimensional systolic mechanics in canine ventricular myocardium. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H595–H607.[Medline]
8. Arts T, Costa KD, Covell JW, McCulloch AD. Relating myocardial laminar architecture to shear strain and muscle fiber orientation. Am J Physiology Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280: H2222–H2229.
9. Chen J, Liu W, Zhang H, Lacy L, Yang X, Song SK, Wickline SA, Yu X. Regional ventricular wall thickening reflects changes in cardiac fiber and sheet structure during contraction: quantification with diffusion tensor MRI. Am J Physiology Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289: H1898–H1907.[CrossRef]
10. Helm PA, Tseng HJ, Younes L, McVeigh ER, Winslow RL. Ex vivo 3D diffusion tensor imaging and quantification of cardiac laminar structure. Magn Reson Med. 2005; 54: 850–859.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Hooks DA, Tomlinson KA, Marsden SG, LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH, Pullan AJ, Hunter PJ. Cardiac microstructure: implications for electrical propagation and defibrillation in the heart. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 331–338.
12. Frazier DW, Krassowska W, Chen PS, Wolf PD, Danieley ND, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Transmural activations and stimulus potentials in three-dimensional anisotropic canine myocardium. Circ Res. 1988; 63: 135–146.
13. Taccardi B, Punske BB, Macchi E, MacLeod RS, Ershler PR. Epicardial and intramural excitation during ventricular pacing: effect of myocardial structure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 294: H1753–H1766.
14. Rogers JM, Melnick SB, Huang J. Fiberglass needle electrodes for transmural cardiac mapping. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002; 49: 1639–1641.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Ni Q, MacLeod RS, Lux RL. Three-dimensional activation mapping in ventricular muscle: interpolation and approximation of activation times. Ann Biomed Eng. 1999; 27: 617–626.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Gerneke DA, Sands GB, Ganesalingam R, Joshi P, Caldwell BJ, Smaill BH, Legrice IJ. Surface imaging microscopy using an ultramiller for large volume 3D reconstruction of wax- and resin-embedded tissues. Microsc Res Technique. 2007; 70: 886–894.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Karlon WJ, Covell JW, McCulloch AD, Hunter JJ, Omens JH. Automated measurement of myofiber disarray in transgenic mice with ventricular expression of ras. Anat Rec. 1998; 252: 612–625.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Roberts DE, Hersh LT, Scher AM. Influence of cardiac fiber orientation on wavefront voltage, conduction velocity, and tissue resistivity in the dog. Circ Res. 1979; 44: 701–712.
19. Taccardi B, Punske BB, Sachse F, Tricoche X, Colli-Franzone P, Pavarino LF, Zabawa C. Intramural activation and repolarization sequences in canine ventricles: experimental and simulation studies. J Electrocardiol. 2005; 38: 131–137.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Hooks DA, Trew ML, Caldwell BJ, Sands GB, LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH. Laminar arrangement of ventricular myocytes influences electrical behavior of the heart. Circ Res. 2007; 101: e103–e112.
21. Colli-Franzone P, Guerri L, Taccardi B. Modeling ventricular excitation: axial and orthotropic anisotropy effects on wavefronts and potentials. Math Biosci. 2004; 188: 191–205.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Colli-Franzone P, Pavarino LF, Taccardi B. Simulating patterns of excitation, repolarization and action potential duration with cardiac Bidomain and Monodomain models. Math Biosci. 2005; 197: 35–66.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Nielsen PM, Le Grice IJ, Smaill BH, Hunter PJ. Mathematical model of geometry and fibrous structure of the heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1991; 260: H1365–H1378.
24. Berenfeld O, Jalife J. Purkinje-muscle reentry as a mechanism of polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias in a 3-dimensional model of the ventricles. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 1063–1077.
25. ten Tusscher KH, Hren R, Panfilov AV. Organization of ventricular fibrillation in the human heart. Circ Res. 2007; 100: e87–e101.
26. Qu Z, Kil J, Xie F, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. Scroll wave dynamics in a three-dimensional cardiac tissue model: roles of restitution, thickness, and fiber rotation. Biophys J. 2000; 78: 2761–2775.[Medline]
27. Berenfeld O, Wellner M, Jalife J, Pertsov AM. Shaping of a scroll wave filament by cardiac fibers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Physics. 2001; 63: 619–624.
28. Xie F, Qu Z, Yang J, Baher A, Weiss JN, Garfinkel A. A simulation study of the effects of cardiac anatomy in ventricular fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 2003; 113: 686–693.[CrossRef]
29. Rohr S, Kucera JP, Fast VG, Kleber AG. Paradoxical improvement of impulse conduction in cardiac tissue by partial cellular uncoupling. Science. 1997; 275: 841–844.
30. Wikswo JP, Lin S-F, Abbas RA. Virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue: a common mechanism for anodal and cathodal stimulation. Biophys J. 1995; 69: 2195–2210.[Medline]
31. Tranum-Jensen J, Wilde AA, Vermeulen JT, Janse MJ. Morphology of electrophysiologically identified junctions between Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle in rabbit and pig hearts. Circ Res. 1991; 69: 429–437.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |