Letter by Penela et al Regarding Article, “Standard Ablation Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Ablation in the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia”
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
To the Editor:
We read with great interest the article published in this journal by Zghaib et al1 In their research letter, the authors describe the results of a multicentre prospective nonrandomized study that included 24 patients undergoing catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). Patients were assigned, according to physician discretion, to traditional or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–aided ablation. The MRI information in the latter group was used to focus the electroanatomical map in those areas with late gadolinium enhancement. During follow-up, this approach was …